1.) The auother's main purpose in writing this article is that while people are smoking non-smokers shouldn't go near them. This way the lungs can be protected and they couldn't get any second-hand smoking. I extremely agree with author that smoking shouldn't be allowed in the building because it cause many problems like leaving your gas on and the whole apartment will get burned because of only one cigarette.
2.) I disagree with this statment that U.S. citizens who smoke are not the victims of discrimintation. They are not the victims of discrimination because it is their choice. They also know that smoking can kill them. Smokers cannot quit because they are addicted to it. For example, my friend smokes, she tried quitting ten times but she was not able to quit it because she is addicted. I hangout with her whenever she's not smoking.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree with that individuals should not be smoking indoors but outdoors and also somking inside can cause lots of problems.
ReplyDeleteYou have given facts, but you have not stated the author's main purpose in writing this article. The discrimination part is does the government have the right to regulate what you do in your own home??
ReplyDeleteI agree with you Manpreet..as long as the smoker's smoke in their homes only their family gets affected..and the general public does not get affected..
ReplyDeleteI think you are right. I do not think they are discriminated against.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you, I think that smokers should be able to smoke in places that do not affect non-smokers to keep the risk of becoming ill from second hand smoke low.
ReplyDeleteI agree, smoking should be allowed but only in one's privacy.If smokers chose to smoke they should smoke in areas that are considerate to others in the area.
ReplyDelete